A View to a Kill
Zorin: “Intuitive improvisation is the secret of genius.” Bond: “Brilliant, I am almost speechless with
admiration”.
Roger Moore’s last Bond film is proof of how challenging it is for a longtime
Bond actor to conclude with a strong entry.
Few Bond fans would claim Connery’s best is Never Say Never Again or
that Brosnan’s is Die Another Day. The
tone shifts a lot, and there is both more violence and silliness than usual. The villain, Max Zorin has a psychotic
personality as a result of Nazi experiments on his pregnant mother when she was
in a concentration camp. The violence,
nearly all of it initiated by Zorin, is effective, though I think a few scenes
could have been implied rather than shown outright. The silliness could have been dropped
entirely.
As always there are spoilers below so please be forewarned before
proceeding.
A View to a Kill was the first Bond film I saw in theatres. I had seen a few others (Octopussy, The Spy Who Loved Me, Never Say
Never Again, Goldfinger for sure and perhaps one or two others). I remember the TV ads with the tag lines “Has
James Bond finally met his match?” with footage of the opening sequence in
Siberia and the climax on the Golden Gate Bridge. There was a one sheet with Bond in the tuxedo
standing back to back with Mayday. A few
months earlier I had seen Grace Jones in Conan the Destroyer and I knew that
could make for an interesting contrast.
When first watching the film I took comfort in Moore's presence but
even at age 12 I could see he looked a little old.
Looking at it now, Moore’s performance has obvious strengths and
weaknesses. He actually looks more fit
than in the previous two films and is strong in the dramatic moments,
particularly two scenes in which he reacts with disgust to two of Zorin’s
kills, outside the Rolls Royce and in Howe’s office. Also the funniest moments in the film are
when Bond and Tibbett are undercover at Chantilly and Bond is having a lot of
fun mistreating Tibbett. By working with
Patrick MacNee in this setting Moore has in his seventh outing, a new angle
with which to portray Bond which is refreshing.
However, it is obvious that Moore’s stunt double is handling a lot of the
action moments. If Moore’s age (56-57 during
filming) was factored in and the film was about an aging Bond who is a little slower
than before a la Never Say Never Again it might work. One of Moore’s biggest strengths as Bond is
his quip delivery but here Moore makes big eyes at times during his some of his
jokes, which undercuts the effect and indicates self-consciousness rather than
trusting the material.
The team that made the well-received previous Eon film, Octopussy, is
reassembled here (director John Glen, screenwriters Richard Maibaum and Michael
G. Wilson, production designer Peter Lamont, and composer John Barry) and the
final product works better if viewed as individual sequences instead of a
cohesive whole.
The cast is interesting with Christopher Walken as Max Zorin, portraying
cleverness and vicious unpredictability effectively. Zorin is shown almost entirely from a
distance from Bond’s point of view until Bond actually meets him. Grace Jones’
May Day is one of the more outrageous characters in the series, who is a
superstrong henchwoman who seems like a cat, always stalking and then striking. Like Pussy Galore in Goldfinger Mayday is in
charge of heading a group of women who work for Zorin but eventually turns on
him, though not because of Bond’s bizarre seduction of her. Instead Mayday ultimately helps Bond because
she realizes that Zorin was willing to let her die. Tanya Roberts plays Stacey Sutton, a
geologist and oil heiress who is trying to stop Zorin from taking control of
her late father’s oil company.
On paper Stacey has a good backstory.
Stacey’s solo stand against a powerful industrialist is admirable and it
is she who identifies the danger of pumping seawater into an oil well. Stacey represents a human character directly
impacted by Zorin which helps the audience relate to his threat. However in the last half of the film Stacey
is often screaming for help and overdressed, particularly in the mine
sequence. Roberts also looks too young
to be a love interest for Moore and does not have the presence of Maud Adams
was in the previous film. Fiona
Fullerton, playing a sometime Russian lover of Bond, who appears in a few
scenes, might have been better casting for Stacey.
Many viewers have noticed that Zorin’s scheme is reminiscent of
Goldfinger’s. Zorin wants to destroy
Silicon Valley to increase the value of his own microchips as Goldinger wished
to do the same for his gold by destroying Fort Knox. Both films feature a strong female character
who is initially aligned with the villain who then switches sides. Each film also has a scene in which the
villain explains the plan to a group of other people and kills a person who
decides not to participate, (though Goldfinger eventually kills everyone else
too).
I have noticed that A View to a Kill also copies several beats from
Octopussy. In both
films:
· Bond steals a car from an obnoxious person who
becomes an obstacle during a crisis.
· John Barry introduces a new action theme and a very romantic version of the main theme (though Barry wrote romantic instrumental versions for most of his Bond scores).
· There is a countdown to a ticking bomb (other Bond films have this too).
· The villain kidnaps the leading lady and taking off in a flying vehicle which Bond climbs onto to and eventually manages to use to dispatch the bad guy.
· The villain tells his primary underling to go outside the vehicle to finish Bond off and the henchman pauses, not entirely excited about the prospect.
· There is a scene right after the climax with M, the Minister of Defence and Gogol in M’s office, then cuts to the final love scene.
· John Barry introduces a new action theme and a very romantic version of the main theme (though Barry wrote romantic instrumental versions for most of his Bond scores).
· There is a countdown to a ticking bomb (other Bond films have this too).
· The villain kidnaps the leading lady and taking off in a flying vehicle which Bond climbs onto to and eventually manages to use to dispatch the bad guy.
· The villain tells his primary underling to go outside the vehicle to finish Bond off and the henchman pauses, not entirely excited about the prospect.
· There is a scene right after the climax with M, the Minister of Defence and Gogol in M’s office, then cuts to the final love scene.
From here I will note a few items throughout the body of the film.
The pretitle sequence shows Bond in Siberia, recovering a chip from a
fallen agent. It is a little sad to the
see the body of 003 frozen, particularly when Bond opens his locket and we see
a picture of a wife and child in front of the microchip. The subsequent chase once Bond is discovered
is exciting with some terrific stunts (especially the somersault with the skis
on). Barry’s new action score propels the onscreen action as Bond tries to ski
away from his Russian pursuers. However
the inclusion of “California Girls” removes any sense of danger. Moore looks properly tense once he is facing
off against the helicopter (foreshadowed right after the gunbarrel) and his use
of the flare to dispatch it is ingenuous.
The title sequence is ok but not Maurice Binder's most creative. Duran Duran's song is a fantastic rock tune with a catchy melody.
The Ascot scene is notable for the rare opportunity to see the MI6 team
dressed for a day at the races, and is a creative introduction of Zorin and
Mayday to the audience. Moneypenny is
delightful in spoofing Eliza Doolittle from My Fair Lady.
In the Eiffel tower restaurant scene the French inspector seems a bit
cartoonish, especially his closing line.
This contrasts oddly against Moore who is playing the scene more
seriously, and the elegant setting. Bond
seems to notice that the person moving the butterflies is knocked out but he
never warns the inspector of danger, instead politely allowing him to finish
his sentence.
When Bond is pursuing Mayday he flinches when firing his gun. Compare this to how he handles the pistol
shootout on the circus train in Octopussy when Bond is completely engaged. Also it is clear that a lot of effort is
covering up the fact that Moore is not actually moving up those stairs. Imagine the same scene with any of Moore’s
three successors and we can imagine a Bond running so hard after Mayday that she
would be lucky to make it to the top in time.
Mayday’s jump off the tower and parachuting down is impressively shot
and scored. Bond’s driving in pursuit is
so bad in the service of trying to create cheap laughs it makes me wonder if
this is the same character we have seen expertly drive in other
situations. I think the scene would have
been much better if Bond had simply chased Mayday in the car without tearing
the car apart by driving in opposing lanes.
The Chantilly scenes are interesting mostly for the country estate. Some critics of the film point out that Bond
spends most of this section of the film trying to prove that Zorin is using steroids
on Pegasus, rather than investigating the microchips. I see it less literal, and is a way for Bond
to see Zorin up front and in his element.
Although Bond and Tibbett are there for a horse auction, we never see
it.
Although I enjoy the score to the film Barry’s use of the romantic theme
during the Bond Mayday seduction scene seems out of place since Bond is just
trying to cover up his snooping and Mayday just is using it as a chance to
dominate him.
It is a bit surprising that, even though it is a cover, that Tibbett
would take a Rolls Royce to a gas station car wash instead of one designed to
take care of expensive cars, of which there should be plenty in a place like
Chantilly. I imagine that a BP
sponsorship influenced the choice.
The attempt to kill Bond by drowning the Rolls Royce is inventive and
Bond’s solution equally so. It seems
appropriate that Zorin and Mayday would want to watch their handiwork and the
shots of Bond underwater looking up are interesting.
Zorin’s murder of the Russian agent by throwing him into the underwater
fan is brutal and only hints at how
depraved he is.
I have read, though do not know how true the rumors are, that Pola was
originally to be Anya Amasova from The Spy Who Loved Me. If so the appearance would have been a seamless
continuation of their relationship from that film (sexy and also trying to
one-up each other). Though a visit from
Anya would have been welcome for Moore’s final film, Pola is an equally
intriguing character.
The look at everyday life, with Stacy driving home from work listening
to the radio, to Bond and Stacy eating a home-cooked meal is a refreshing
change from the constant elegant restaurants.
Although the City Hall fire sequence is visually impressive, Bond seems
to get out of trouble easily. Also how
did the police find Howe’s body since no one was shown entering the building
after the fire started?
The firetruck sequence is out of place and the actor playing the frustrated
police chief is not given anything interesting to do. At least JW Pepper, as played by Clifton
James in Live and Let Die, who was also faced with pursuing Bond through his
precinct, had colorful lines (offensive as many of them were). There is one potential nod to the San
Francisco gay life when Bond knocks the hats off two men sitting fairly close
to each other in an open car when hanging from the ladder, though I am not sure
if the filmmakers were trying to make a tasteless joke at their expense by
staging it that way.
The mine sequence has one of the most reviled scenes in the series in
which Zorin guns down several of the workers before drowning them. I accept that Zorin is psychotic but the
length of the scene and Zorin’s enjoyment of it is out of place in this type of
film, although at least we don't see much blood. There was a similar scene in
Schindler’s List in which Ralph Fiennes character, Goth, is introduced randomly
shooting innocent Jews and the horrifying effect of that scene is appropriate,
given the subject matter.
Scarpine, who just seems like a nasty henchman, albeit somewhat
cultured, is next to Zorin also shooting down the workers so I wonder if his
motivation is only money.
The long awaited fight between Bond and Mayday never materializes since
just as Mayday catches Bond they are both thrown into the water. This avoids either a scene of Bond getting
beat up by a woman or finding a way to kill one who is much stronger than he
is, either of which would have been pretty uncomfortable to watch, especially
at the time. Goldeneye was able to
handle a similar challenge with the use of Xenia Onatopp ten years later.
The kidnapping of Stacy is a bit unlikely but I will forgive it since it
allows for the fantastic visuals of the zeppelin going through San Francisco. The slower score seems to match the more
deliberate pace of the zeppelin.
The stuntwork and music editing of the Golden Gate fight is thrilling. The cut after Stacy knocks out Scarpine to
Zorin angrily unbuckling his seat belt creates a discomfort that now his blood
boiling. Zorin’s appearance with the ax in
the small space creates a huge sense of danger since he doesn’t just want to
kill Bond, he wants to cut him in half (which he tries on the first
swing). Bond’s wits, used throughout the
sequence in tying the zeppelin to the bridge, alone allow him to overcome
Zorin. Walken’s decision to have Zorin
cackle in response to Mortner’s anguished cry at seeing him in danger is
curious. Either Zorin wants to comfort
Mortner or he is (as he has been throughout the film) bemused by Bond getting
the better of him. Stacy’s reaction to
Bond’s quip about a cab seems more like the actress laughing at one of Moore’s jokes
than an in character response.
The final scene, with Q’s dog like robot finding Bond in the shower with
Stacy is enjoyable. A lot of the finales
of the Moore Bond films have the Mi6 team somehow intruding on Bond’s
celebratory final love scene so it seems fitting.
In summation, A View to a Kill cannot overcome its weaknesses but is
worth a look for its positive traits. Although Roger Moore is not my favorite Bond his portrayal is always interesting and his tenure produced several memorable films. I wish he had concluded with a stronger entry but the next film in the series, The Living Daylights, compensates by far ** (out of five).
Comments
Post a Comment